Meta ads & tracking · 3 min read

Meta removed placement exclusions and added Threads. How to keep control

You can no longer switch placements off in many ad sets. Value rules and account controls still let you steer spend. What each one does, with the maths.

By the Pixel Caption growth team

Pixel Caption cover: feed, Reels and Threads tiles above three sliders, one pulled low. Keep control of your Meta placements.

What changed

From late August, advertisers started finding that they could no longer exclude placements, platforms, devices or operating systems inside an ad set. Reports say it applies to Sales, Leads, Engagement and App promotion campaigns, and that it is rolling out account by account. Meta has not made a formal announcement.

At the same time, Threads is a default placement. When you run a campaign in Ads Manager you are opted in to ads on Threads.

What Meta says

Meta’s own help pages say Advantage+ placements give an 11.7% lower cost per action on average than manual placements. That is an average across advertisers. Your account may differ, which is why the tools below still matter.

What still works

ToolWhat it does
Account-level placement controlsIn advertising settings, account controls. Blocks a placement across the whole account, not per ad set.
Value rulesRaise or lower what Meta bids for a placement, from +1,000% down to −90%. You can make a placement expensive to win, not impossible.
Brand safety controlsBlock lists and inventory filters, for where your ads must never appear.

The maths of a weak placement

Say an ad set spends ₹1,00,000 in a week (illustrative numbers). ₹85,000 goes to Instagram and Facebook feeds and Reels at ₹600 per purchase, giving about 142 orders. ₹15,000 goes to a weaker placement at ₹1,500 per purchase, giving 10 orders.

Ads Manager shows one blended number: ₹1,00,000 ÷ 152 orders = about ₹659 per purchase. It looks only a little worse than ₹600, so most people never open the breakdown. But the weak placement costs two and a half times as much per order.

A −90% value rule tells Meta that a purchase from that placement is worth a tenth as much to you. Meta will then only win that placement when it’s very cheap. If it still delivers orders at a good cost, it earns its place; if not, spend moves back to what works.

What we do in an account

  • Open Breakdown, then By delivery, then Placement, for the last 14 days. Sort by cost per purchase.
  • Only act on placements with real spend. A placement with ₹2,000 and no orders hasn’t had a fair test yet.
  • Use a value rule before an account-wide block. A block is blunt; a rule lets a placement prove itself when it’s cheap.
  • Check that your creative fits each placement. A 1:1 image stretched into Reels or Threads loses more than any bid rule can fix.
  • Review again after two weeks, since Meta’s delivery changes as it learns.

Sources we checked

  • Jon Loomer and PPC Land, August 2026: ad set placement exclusions removed; value rules capped at −90%.
  • Social Media Today: which campaign objectives lost placement controls.
  • Meta Business Help Center: Threads ads on by default; Advantage+ placements and the 11.7% figure.
  • The worked example is ours and illustrative. It is not a client’s data.

Get new posts by email

Practical D2C and Shopify notes from our team, one or two a month.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

We use your email only for what you asked for. Privacy notice

Written by the Pixel Caption growth teamNotes from our performance marketing team.
[ more notes ]

Keep reading

All posts

Is a weak placement eating your budget?

Our growth team checks your placement breakdown and sets the rules that move spend to what sells.

Get a free growth audit

Pixel Captionnow